Vital mobile harm reduction services provided by PARN (Peterborough AIDS Resource Network) are taking a huge step forward with not just one but two new outreach vehicles entering service.

Since 2016, PARN has used a decommissioned ambulance — wrapped with a design by Peterborough illustrator and muralist Jason Wilkins — to provide harm reduction supplies and naloxone kits to drug users throughout the city and county of Peterborough, the City of Kawartha Lakes, Northumberland County, and Haliburton County.

However, with some 340,000 kilometres of wear and tear on its big V10 engine and high fuel costs and increasing maintenance needs, that vehicle is being retired for much more efficient options.

PARN recently took possession of a Dodge Caravan from Kawartha Chrysler that’s expected to go into service the first week of March. As well, another van is on order and should be in PARN’s possession later in March.

According to PARN executive director Dane Record, when funding provided under Health Canada’s Substance Use and Addictions Program (SUAP) became available in 2024, he worked with City of Peterborough project manager Jessica Penner to ensure PARN’s need was known.

“They (Health Canada) had emergency funding that was being made available to municipalities,” recalls Record, crediting Palmer for her role.

“PARN was approached and asked if we wanted to get a vehicle,” Record explains. “I said ‘Yes.’ They said ‘OK, what type of vehicle are you looking for? Give us some more information.’ I asked ‘Can we think big here?’ So we shot for the stars and we got the stars. We were able, with a hell of a lot of collaboration, to obtain the funding to purchase not just one vehicle but two.”

“Being able to have two vehicles means PARN can route back to a full-service mobile reach right across the four counties. We are commissioning art from people with lived experience — local artists. It’ll be a modernized design. But, in being modern, we don’t want to diminish the legacy of the current truck, so we’re going to see we if can keep an element of the familiar design.”

That legacy, notes Record, goes back to 2016 when PARN took possession of a donated ambulance-style vehicle and was used to service rural areas — “Some of the spots that PARN was not able to reach on a steady basis, number one, but two, wasn’t able to get our name out to.”

“We got some artwork commissioned by a community member (Wilkins) that was really helpful in getting PARN’s name out. When we’re out and about, and folks see the truck, they know they’re going to be connecting with folks who get it. They have a clear understanding of who they’re working with. Many of our friends in the communities we serve look to us as their first contact if ever anything is going on in their lives.”

Record credits the vision of former PARN executive director Kim Dolan and the late Charles Shamess with, through the mobile outreach initiative, “finding a way to not only market PARN’s visibility but also be intentional in meeting people where they are at, which was vital at that time.”

“What it did was make the overall work efficient,” adds Record. “At the beginning, it took a bit of time but that consistent presence — letting folks know who we are, what we do and why we do it — and what the truck signifies is where we were able to see enhancement in program outreach.”

“It also helped with enhancing some of our agency partnerships. Being able to work with (Peterborough) Street Medicine and some of the CHCs (community health centres) at the time, we were able to utilize the truck to not only reach people as PARN to do HIV and hepatitis C prevention work, but also bring agency partners with us — medical and clinical staff who would track behind us in their vehicles or even ride along with us.”

“From day one right up to today, people see the truck and know that it’s PARN staff. They’re wearing branded gear the majority of the time. And if there’s somebody tagging long, be it a clinician, a nurse, or any other clinical professional, they know they’re legit; they can be trusted because they’re riding with PARN. ”

Not unlike the outgoing mobile unit, the new vehicles will be stocked with harm reduction equipment, and will accommodate the distribution of HIV and hepatitis C prevention tools as well as safer sex resources and drug use supplies. Record notes yellow disposal bins for used sharps (needles) are also part of the mobile unit’s arsenal.

“When we’re out in the counties and folks see the truck, if there’s a place where there’s a lot of sharps that have been used that needs to be safely disposed, they know we’ll come and get them,” he explains.

“We have a number of kiosks scattered around the city and the counties. For those who might not make that walk to dispose of their contents, they see the truck and they know their yellow bin is going to be taken, and that they’ll receive a new one.”

Also carried by the mobile unit are naloxone injectable and nasal kits.

“Folks trust us to give them what works,” says Record.

Asked if PARN’s mobile unit has led directly to the saving of lives, Record says PARN’s role “is to prevent harms historically connected to HIV and hepatitis C infection, diagnosis and prevention, and harms associated in the broader community with accidental drug poisonings and substance-related injectable or inhalation harms.”

“The organization can’t put a number on the lives saved, and I’m not going to take a guess. But I can say, quite confidently, that PARN plays a major role, especially in Peterborough, alongside our partners. We, with them, play a vital role in preventing accidental drug poisonings, drug-related harms and, ultimately, drug use mortality.”

Not lost of Record, along with anyone involved in this work, is the fact that local deaths related to poisoned drug use dropped dramatically in 2025 from the year prior.

In the city of Peterborough in 2023, 78 deaths were attributed to poisoned drug use and, in 2024, 60 deaths were reported. That number dropped to 42 last year.

“There’s no luck involved,” says Record of the decrease in deaths. “That’s hard work, and it’s work that continues to be improved upon with the role that PARN plays in harm reduction (and) a major role by Fourcast with the CTS (Consumption and Treatment Services) site where their skilled team of staff provide addiction and treatment options.”

“The fact that folks are able to, and are willing to, work with trusted collaborators to address their drug journeys, whether they want to taper down, use less, or (when) maybe stopping is a goal. They’re trusting organizations such as PARN, Fourcast, CMHA, 360 (Degree Nurse Practitioner Led Clinic), and One City, and their continued advocacy and work. All that put together is contributing to the reduction in mortality rates. Absolutely.”

While Record admits to being “very excited” for the new vehicles’ taking to the road, he’s “more excited for our friends in the community and our teammates on the front lines to be able to continue the work, and now, expand and enhance the work.”

Over 800 people gathered at the McDonnel Street Activity Centre in Peterborough on Thursday (February 26) for a public open house hosted by Alto as part of its early consultation process for the proposed high-speed rail network between Toronto and Quebec City, which would include a stop in Peterborough.

From 11 a.m. to 3 p.m. and again from 5 to 9 p.m., residents, elected officials, and stakeholders had an opportunity to learn more about the project and speak directly with Alto staff about potential routes, station locations, land use impacts, and next steps as planning for the long-term infrastructure project moves forward.

Traffic lined the street before the doors opened, the parking lot filled quickly, and there was a steady hum of conversation inside the room as attendees moved between information stations to ask questions one-on-one with the Alto team. According to Alto, 815 people had attended the two sessions by the end of the day.

By design, the Peterborough consultation was a drop-in open house format instead of a formal presentation.

There were eight mini-stations, with multiple Alto staff circulating throughout the room and speaking directly with attendees in small groups, answering specific questions and hearing concerns. Several people described the room as “buzzing,” with a level of excitement that felt, to some, like “next level” momentum.

That momentum, however, came paired with a theme repeated throughout the open house: it’s still very early days. Alto staff emphasized the initial public consultations are focused less on presenting final answers and more on gathering local feedback and knowledge that can shape next steps.

“We’re here to listen”

Alto’s senior advisor of community relations Joel Wiebe, who was previously vice-president of government relations and operations for the Peterborough and Kawarthas Chamber of Commerce before joining Alto last October, said many residents arrived at the open house hoping for definitive answers — especially around route alignment and where a station might ultimately land.

“I think a lot of people come wanting a lot of answers, and we’re still very early on in the process,” Wiebe told kawarthaNOW. “We’re here to listen — we want more local knowledge on this project.”

Wiebe said Alto has been hosting open houses throughout the corridor specifically to collect feedback before making alignment decisions.

“People want to know where the train is going, but we don’t want to put those alignments down until we talk to the communities it’s going through,” he said. “There are a lot of things we’re learning in these sessions that aren’t necessarily on official maps — environmentally sensitive areas, culturally sensitive areas, and things that are important to communities. The best way to find that out is to actually go into the areas and talk to the people who live there.”

Wiebe stressed that the consultation process is not a formality — and that there is no predetermined route being quietly advanced behind the scenes.

“There’s no secret alignment that we’re just doing token service around,” he said. “The comments that are coming in online and through these open houses are being reviewed by our engineers.”

Wiebe said Alto is asking practical and community-focused questions as feedback comes in. Did planners have all the relevant constraints in scope? Were they aware of the places — and the values — that matter locally?

“Not just physical elements, but what’s culturally important to communities we may be crossing through or setting up solutions in,” Wiebe said.

Even when that feedback is skeptical or critical, Wiebe said it remains essential.

“Not all of it is positive, but those concerns come from a real place, and we want to make sure that’s incorporated,” he said. “There’s no easy way to build a project like this, but the more information we have going into it, the better decisions we’re able to make.”

The best route is the one that will have the least impact on the community

Philippe Archambault, Alto’s vice-president of communications and brand, travelled from Montreal for the Peterborough session and said the turnout matched what Alto has seen elsewhere. Around 200 people showed up within the first hour of the open house.

“Usually we have between 300 and 500 people per open house, so this is a really good turnout for the first half of the day,” Archambault said. “We are receiving a lot of good and constructive comments.”

Archambault said the entire point of holding consultations now, before a route is finalized, is to identify the option that has the least impact on the people and places the corridor would pass through.

“This is why we are doing this exercise as early in the process — to make sure that before the route is finalized, we can gather as many comments, questions, and concerns as possible to identify the best route — the one that will have the least impact on the community,” he said. “The best way to do that is to have feedback from people who live here and know the area.”

Archambault said Alto expects multiple rounds of public consultation as plans become more detailed.

“We will come back later with a more refined corridor and have a second round of consultation,” he said. “For segment one (Ottawa to Montreal), there will be a second phase of consultation this year, and for segments two and three (Montreal to Quebec City and Ottawa to Toronto), that will follow into 2027.”

He added that Alto is also engaging directly with municipalities and elected officials, focusing on how the project would integrate with land use and urban planning.

“It’s all about communication and collaboration,” Archambault said.

Concerns about farmland impacts and land acquisition

For many attendees, the biggest questions involved the route itself, including farmland impacts and land acquisition.

Michelle Caldwell, who lives in the Fife’s Bay area, said her primary concern is how Alto will acquire land along the route.

“I think my number one concern would be land expropriation,” Caldwell said. “What does that mean to heritage farmers? What does that mean to residential members of Peterborough? How are they going to acquire this land in order to build the rail line? Is it going to be up to the landowner?”

Caldwell said she came looking for specifics — and found the answers vague.

“I got beautiful, flowery answers,” she said, adding that if land in other parts of the corridor is already secured, she wants to know how that was achieved and what the plan will be locally for direct communication with landowners.

David Ramsay, a downtown Peterborough resident who has lived in the city for more than 40 years, said his concern was similar: the apparent scale of new land acquisition required.

“I thought that perhaps it was going to be using existing rights-of-way, but it appears that it’s a whole new thing — that they’re going to be acquiring land where they can,” Ramsay said. “So that’s a big issue.”

Michael Eamon of Trent University said land and route impacts were also what he heard most often during conversations at the open house.

“A lot of people are worried about their farms — about their land being expropriated or taken — or about the routes they’re used to having being cut off by a high-speed rail line with no crossings,” Eamon said.

Asked directly about these concerns, Archambault said Alto would be contacting landowners directly and in person if or when land negotiations begin.

“We want to be as transparent and as human as possible,” Archambault said. “The first contact will always be made directly by us, by a person.”

While expropriation is legally possible, he said Alto views it as a last resort.

“Expropriation is a tool that we have, but it is not a tool that we want to use first,” Archambault said. “The first objective is to have discussions with landowners and try to negotiate a mutual agreement while minimizing the impact.”

He added that if only part of a property is required, the intention would be to limit the impact and maintain existing land use wherever feasible.

Station location and the “last-mile” question

While concerns about a potential route dominated the conversations at the open house, discussion about station location also surfaced repeatedly, especially in the context of how people would actually reach the station — particularly those who don’t drive.

Mark Woolley, recently retired and car-free for 20 years, said he supports high-speed rail but worries about practical access if a station is placed on the edge of town.

The City of Peterborough is eyeing the Coldsprings growth area, located at the southern limit of the city, as a potential location for an Alto station because of its large area, proximity to existing transportation facilities, and relatively unencumbered land use pattern.

“I can see the logic for placing the station on the edge of town,” Woolley said. “But my question, going back to being car-free, is ‘How do I get there?'”

Woolley pointed to his experience visiting Dijon in France — a city he chose in part because of its new streetcar lines and direct rail connections.

“That’s certainly what you saw in Dijon — both of the streetcar lines they built went directly to the rail station,” he said, adding he hopes Alto and local governments will consider transit connections as part of overall planning.

Neil Morton, a local entrepreneur and marketing consultant, said he views the project as an economic win even if the station ends up outside the downtown.

“Coldsprings works to me,” Morton said. “I don’t see how it’s going to work right through Peterborough. But as long as it’s in this area, it’s going to have a massive impact on Peterborough and the county, and it’s a win-win for both of us.”

Morton believes the project could draw new residents, increase tourism, and raise the region’s profile — without erasing Peterborough’s identity.

“This is like winning the lottery that we’re getting Alto here,” he said. “This is the kind of project that has a generational impact — something that’s going to shape what this region looks like for decades to come.”

Eamon said that, in his conversations, very few people are concerned about the station location.

“People are more worried about the route and whether it will ever be built,” he added.

Local political support for “transformative” project

Several local politicians also attended the open house’s morning session, including Peterborough mayor Jeff Leal, who said the turnout itself signalled the level of local interest in the Alto project.

“You can tell it’s a good turnout when you can’t find a parking spot,” Leal said. “There’s no question that high-speed rail with a stop at Peterborough is a game-changer for the region.”

Leal compared the project’s potential nation-shaping impact to the construction of the 306-kilometre stretch of the St. Lawrence Seaway between Montreal and Lake Ontario during the mid and late 1950s, which has been called one of the most challenging engineering feats in history,

“I would liken this project to the St. Lawrence Seaway in terms of magnitude, scope, and the ability to change the landscape for Canada,” he said.

Leal, who served as Ontario’s minister of agriculture and rural affairs from 2013 to 2018, acknowledged the sensitivity around farmland impacts. He referred to the Highway 407 extension during his time as minister.

“Some very good farms were bisected,” Leal said. “There are lessons learned … and we can apply those lessons to this particular project.”

On station location, Leal pointed to geography and rail engineering realities, including river crossings and constraints through urban areas.

“The Coldsprings area … has that narrowest river point,” Leal said. “If you’re really looking at high-speed rail, you want your bridge crossing at the narrowest point.”

Peterborough city councillor Matt Crowley said he believes the project would be “transformative,” citing long-term population and economic impacts, and said the city’s focus should be on readiness.

“I think it’s going to be absolutely transformative for our city,” Crowley said, adding it would expand the municipality’s tax base and strengthen economic development and tourism.

“I’m looking at what’s good for the city 25 or 50 years from now, and getting our city ready now for that future,” he said.

Crowley pointed to continued work on infrastructure and revitalization to prepare for the arrival of Alto.

“We should look at revitalizing the downtown, ensuring that our parks are great and that our infrastructure is solid,” he said.

Peterborough city councillor Lesley Parnell said the potential for a local Alto high-speed rail station presents a significant opportunity for long-term, sustainable growth.

Ideally, she said, a future station would be located in the Coldsprings area east of the Otonabee River, calling it “a blank slate” for thoughtfully planned development.

Parnell envisions a new residential “village of Peterborough” built around the station, with strong connections to active transportation, downtown, the regional airport, Fleming College, Trent University, and other amenities. She also hopes an additional pedestrian crossing over the river could be incorporated alongside a future rail bridge.

“The area east of the river is ideal for servicing and residential intensification,” Parnell said. “We have an incredible opportunity to transport people by train rather than fuelled cars — and to build a new, sustainable village within our city.”

What comes next and how to participate online

Both Wiebe and Archambault encouraged residents who could not attend the open house in person — or who want to submit more detailed comments — to use Alto’s online engagement tools, including a survey and interactive map. Feedback will be accepted until Sunday, March 29.

“The best way is through our online and digital engagement tools,” Wiebe said. “There’s a survey and an interactive map where you can leave feedback, and our engineers are reviewing that regularly.”

Archambault said Alto is also offering multiple formats for engagement, emphasizing that one-on-one conversations can sometimes surface concerns that don’t come out in a traditional town hall.

“That’s why we offer online platforms, virtual sessions, open houses, and roundtable discussions,” he said, adding that questions sent to Alto’s project email are also reviewed and answered by staff.

Upcoming virtual sessions are scheduled for Tuesday, March 3 (in English) and Tuesday, March 17 (in French). For more information on Alto’s public consultation process, visit www.altotrain.ca/en/public-consultation.

What we heard in the room

As attendees at the Peterborough open house moved between Alto’s information stations throughout the day, several themes surfaced repeatedly in one-on-one conversations with staff and among attendees.

“This could be transformative — but it’s going to take time.”

Many described the project as a once-in-a-generation opportunity for the region, while acknowledging that construction — and benefits — may still be years away.

Land use and farmland impacts are the top concern.

Questions about land acquisition, expropriation, and how potential routes could affect heritage farms and rural ecosystems were raised frequently.

“How will people actually get to the station?”

Accessibility — especially for residents without cars — was a recurring issue, with some attendees asking how last-mile transit connections would work if a station is located outside the downtown core.

Excitement about economic development and tourism.

Some participants said improved rail connections could draw new residents, increase tourism, and make commuting to larger urban centres more feasible.

Concern about Peterborough’s character.

Others wondered whether increased connectivity could change the identity of the city or turn it into more of a bedroom community.

Questions about timelines and momentum.

Several attendees noted that with the project still in early planning stages, it remains difficult to visualize what a final route or timeline might look like.

Station location matters — but route matters more.

While some discussion focused on where a station might be built, many conversations centred on where the rail line itself could run and what impacts it might have across the broader region.

Reporting a hate or bias incident in the community could help Peterborough become a safer and kinder place for all.

That’s one of the messages of the revamped N0H8 (pronounced “No Hate) public education and awareness campaign launched by the Peterborough Police Service in January.

Supported by a three-year Proceeds of Crime Grant from the Ontario government, the campaign is intended to raise awareness about what hate looks like, provide educational resources, encourage people to report hate or bias incidents, and reinforce that hate will not be tolerated in the community.

“From our analysis, Peterborough is a community that is willing to report these incidents and we want to see this continue, because then we will have a true picture of the impact these incidents have in our community,” says Chelsea Russelle, Community Development and Engagement Coordinator for the Peterborough Police Service.

“Hate has no place here. Name it. Report it. It is a strong call to action, but we also hope people see it as an opportunity to be kind or even start conversations.”

Over the past five years, an average of 46 hate/bias incidents were reported to the Peterborough Police Service each year, with more than half resulting in charges. Whether police lay charges depends on whether the incident involves a criminal offence.

Under the Criminal Code of Canada, there are four offences specific to hate: advocating genocide, public incitement of hatred, wilful promotion of hatred, and wilful promotion of antisemitism. While police must consult with the Crown Attorney before any of these specific charges can be laid under the Criminal Code, they will record any crime that involves hate as a hate crime.

“If a criminal offence has been committed and there is evidence that it was motivated by race, skin colour, national or ethnic origin, language, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender or gender identity, age, or mental or physical disability, it will be recorded as a hate crime and addressed through the court process which could result in a higher penalty at sentencing,” says Russelle.

A hate or bias incident can also involve actions or behaviours that are motivated by bias or prejudice but do not involve a criminal act. For example, if a neighbour makes an remark about a person’s race during an argument, but no criminal offence occurs, it is a hate incident. These incidents can and should be reported to police, Russelle says, as they can “reveal a pattern of behaviour.”

While reimagining the N0H8 public education and awareness campaign, the Peterborough Police Service connected with community partners to better understand the issues involving hate and bias in the Peterborough community. These partners included the City of Peterborough, New Canadians Centre, Race Relations Committee, and Peterborough Youth Services.

“We learned that each individual community has different views of hate and bias, and our partners are a great resource for making sure information is shared both ways — from the Peterborough Police Service to these communities, and from the communities back to the Peterborough Police Service,” says Russelle.

The N0H8 public education and awareness campaign is just one of the commitments made by the Peterborough Police Service to address hate locally. Training has been made available to members of the service, and there will soon be an online visual tool available to the public, which will provide a better understanding of how and where hate is manifesting in the community through maps and other graphing tools that depict stories about the incidents, as well as how they have affected the community.

“We are trying to show instances of hate and bias in our community through a lens of storytelling, while keeping the intimate details of each incident anonymous,” Russelle says. “We want to provide data from the past five years and shift the narrative from opinion-based comments to fact-based comments.”

Russelle notes that many hate or bias incidents either go unreported, or are posted on social media instead of being reported to the Peterborough Police Service. Without a report, police cannot investigate these incidents.

“There is a tendency to want to share these incidents on social media,” Russelle explains. “However, the police will not launch any investigation just because it is trending online — we don’t have people searching for crimes. There needs to be a reported crime.”

Reports can be made 24/7 through the online portal at www.peterboroughpolice.com/n0h8 or by calling 705-876-1122 ext. 225 (for emergencies, call 9-1-1).

The Peterborough Police Service does not accept reports made through social media platforms like Facebook.

If you witness or are the victim of a hate crime, the Peterborough Police Service suggests gathering as much information about the incident and perpetrator as possible. This could include what happened, where it happened, and what the perpetrator looked like, what they were wearing, and what vehicle they were driving.

Since launching the revamped N0H8 public education and awareness campaign, the Peterborough Police Service has received both positive and negative feedback about the campaign.

“The campaign is not about silencing people or telling people what they can and cannot say,” Russelle points out. “The laws have been the same around hate and hate bias since the 1970s. The purpose of this campaign is to bring awareness to what a hate crime or incident is, how you can report it to police, and how it is handled through our justice system.”

To support the N0H8 public education and awareness campaign, businesses and residents can display the N0H8 sticker in their window, share a message online with a link to the N0H8 resource page, or invite the Peterborough Police Service to community events by emailing Russelle at 935@peterboroughpolice.ca.

Schools are also encouraged to consider having a conversation about the campaign, inviting the Peterborough Police Service’s Community Services Officers to a class and learning how to report hate and bias incidents.

“We encourage everyone to start conversations, and if you hear something concerning, say something,” says Russelle. “Hate has no place here in our community.”

For more information about the N0H8 public education and awareness campaign, visit www.peterboroughpolice.com/n0h8.

This branded editorial was created in partnership with the Peterborough Police Service. If your organization or business is interested in a branded editorial, contact us.

In a packed room at the Peterborough Lions Community Centre earlier this week, Ontario NDP MPP Chandra Pasma admitted, “I am going to depress you.”

She quickly delivered on her promise by detailing the current state of the Ontario public school system. From professional shortages to derelict buildings, the picture she paints is bleak.

As part of a series of “education emergency townhall” events, the Ottawa West-Nepean MPP visited Peterborough on Monday evening (February 23) to host a community conversation on education funding and democratic local oversight.

Bill 33 seen as government takeover of public school system

The townhall events are a continuation of the Ontario NDP’s critiques of Bill 33, Supporting Children and Students Act (2025), which the Ford government passed last November.

The legislation purports to take Ontario “back to basics” for the benefit of students, parents, and teachers. Most notably, it grants education minister Paul Calandra the power to place school boards under provincial supervision.

In introducing Bill 33 last June, Calandra spoke about accountability, efficiency, and transparency and walked the Legislature through a series of amendments to provincial legislation primarily concerning children and students.

Pasma, who is the education critic for the official opposition, has criticized Bill 33 as an attempt to “take over” the public school system, and opened Question Period last June with the question, “Why is the minister grabbing more power to himself?”

Monday’s townhall in Peterborough featured a number of notable leaders in the education sector in the region, including moderator David Berger, who is president of the Kawartha Pine Ridge Elementary Teachers Federation of Ontario (EFTO) Teachers Local.

The panel explored the experience of engaging with the education system through a variety of perspectives. By including lived experiences of teachers, parents, and students, the event gave voice to those who feel disempowered by legislation and government practices.

Concerns over provincial supervision of school boards

Pasma and Berger opened the event with a clear message: Bill 33 is an attack on Ontario’s schools and an attack on Ontario’s democracy, especially at the local level.

The legislation enables the education minister to place a school board under investigation and subsequently under the supervision of a ministry appointee. To date, seven school boards have been placed under supervision, with another placed on notice.

This is not the first time the Ford government has used this technique, as seen with the appointment of a supervisor at the Kawartha-Haliburton Children’s Aid Society in 2024 amid ongoing reviews of the child welfare sector.

Berger highlighted this first as he criticized the ministry’s circumvention of the democratic process. School board trustees are elected by voters in their jurisdiction, whereas supervisors are appointed by the minister. Many school boards also have representatives from First Nations, francophone, or Catholic communities.

Throughout the townhall, Pasma spoke about the significance of removing trustees who act as the voice of the community as well as advocates for families.

Bill 33 allows the education minister to take supervisory action on the basis of “concerns about a matter of public interest.” Calandra has suggested some examples of this may be financial mismanagement, issues dividing students, and “issues where schools and trustees think that they’re in charge of geopolitical events.”

So far, the Ford government has appointed most of the provincial supervisors for concerns related to alleged financial mismanagement, including Brant Haldimand Norfolk Catholic District School Board trustees travelling to Italy to purchase art and the Toronto District School Board’s plans to rename three schools “whose historical legacies no longer represent the values and perspectives of our students and communities,” according to the school board’s website.

Underfunding means fewer extracurricular activities and arts programs

While Calandra has claimed that such endeavours take money “directly out of the classroom,” opponents of Bill 33 have criticized the legislation is a further step in the defunding of the public education system.

The EFTO has cited a 2025 report from the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives that found the Ontario government has underfunded schools by $6.3 billion since 2018 given inflation and enrolment growth.

A common theme from the panellists at the Peterborough townhall was that, when there is a funding shortfall, the programs and resources that are cut tend to be extracurricular activities and arts programs.

Jeff Bird, a co-op teacher at Crestwood Secondary School in Peterborough, described the importance of the social interaction students get through clubs, trips, and recreational activities. Although he reiterated that academia is the “bedrock” of school, he credits the moments outside of the classroom with leaving long-lasting memories.

“That’s what kids remember,” Bird said.

Sarah Whalen, a teacher at Duke of Cambridge Public School in Bowmanville, spoke about how “teachers feel shame and guilt” when they can no longer run extracurricular programs for students due to a lack of funding, resources, or capacity. She said that when teachers choose not to do these programs, it is a last resort.

Underfunding means less support for students with special needs

Another area identified as being significantly impacted by both chronic underfunding and Bill 33 is special education and support for students with disabilities.

Local parent Heather shared her son’s story of navigating the school system with a disability, and their difficulties in receiving support. Evident in her story was the lack of resources such as educational assistants or dedicated safe spaces at school. Due to being denied resources and support, Heather said she was forced to remove her son from school.

Jen Deck, president of the Kawartha Pine Ridge EFTO Occasional Teachers Local, highlighted the impacts of staffing cuts, especially for students with additional needs.

She explained that teachers are responsible for increasingly large classes that often include multiple children with additional needs. She said educational assistant support for individual children is often not possible due to a lack of staff, and that “schools need more adults in the building” to provide care and build interpersonal relationships with students to best identify and support their needs.

Whalen expressed that teachers know when the budget is tight and are “afraid” of being placed under supervision. All of the education professionals on the panel spoke about the increase in the number of people leaving teaching and the sector, further exacerbating existing staffing issues.

It is not just professionals among whom this is controversial, but also students. Cameron, a university student, described his life as a student under Doug Ford since 2018. Ultimately, his experiences have left him asking “Why should we trust a two-faced government?”, especially with the recent reduction in OSAP funding.

As the session came to a close, the audience was fired up and Pasma took the chance to urge them to take action.

She emphasized the importance of organizing and collaborating outside of the education sector, and said Bill 33 is representative of the Ford government’s political strategy and similar legislation can be seen in the healthcare, child welfare, and social services sectors.

NDP urges public action to repeal Bill 33

“Everyone should care about education,” Pasma told kawarthaNOW, adding that even people without children or young people in their lives are impacted by the public school system.

She said her primary goal is to “build solidarity among communities,” and reiterated the importance of organizing across sectors. She also indicated that other NDP opposition critics — including London West MPP Peggy Sattler, who is the shadow minister for Colleges, Universities, Research Excellence and Security — will be hosting similar events on different issues central to the NDP platform.

Pasma said the NDP’s focus through the townhalls is on encouraging constituents to make direct contact with their local MPP to express their concerns with Bill 33 and to share their experiences.

Pasma pointed to the NDP’s past success in helping to overturn undemocratic bills through sustained pressure, such as 2019’s Bill 124, which limited wage increases for most employees of a large range of public sector employers for three years. The Ontario government repealed the legislation in 2024 after the Ontario Superior Court ruled it was unconstitutional for infringing on unionized employees’ collective bargaining protections.

Fundamentally, the stories of the panellists and the comments from audience members at Monday’s townhall showed a stark contrast between what education professionals, parents, and students are asking for and what the Ontario government is willing to provide.

Calandra has consistently described Bill 33 as returning power to its rightful owners: parents and teachers. But for Pasma and fellow panellists, the legislation is an overreach of governmental powers that removes the power of local communities to have a voice in their schools.

Pasma will be hosting her next “education emergency townhall” in Sarnia on Wednesday, March 4.